After hearing arguments from both sides, an Ohio court determined that a hospital cannot be forced to give ivermectin to patients suffering from COVID-19. Court Michael Oster Jr. of the Common Pleas Court delivered the decision on Monday morning after a temporary injunction given by another judge had expired after 14 days.

Court Rule: Hospital Cannot Be Compelled To Provide Ivermectin To COVID Patients

Following a request for an emergency order for the use of Ivermectin by Julie Smith of the suburban Cincinnati in Butler County Common Pleas Court on August 20, the court granted the request. Smith is 51 years old and has a history of skin problems. Jeffery Smith was diagnosed with COVID-19 around early July and has been confined to an intensive care unit at a Butler County hospital for the last few months.

Court Rule: Hospital Cannot Be Compelled To Provide Ivermectin To COVID Patients

As Dr. Fred Wagshul’s wife requested, Judge Gregory Howard originally gave the green light on August 23 to his prescription of 30 milligrams of Ivermectin daily for three weeks, which the court initially approved. Julie Smith conducted her own research on Ivermectin as a therapeutic option for her husband’s condition and made contact with Wagshul. The medication had been prescribed by him, but the hospital had refused to give it.

On Monday, August 30, 2021, a portion of ivermectin, a horse dewormer, is almost completely depleted on a shelf at Tractor Supply Co. on Raeford Road in Fayetteville. Some individuals think that ivermectin is beneficial in the treatment of COVID-19, however federal health authorities do not suggest it.

In her ruling, the court said that it was “difficult not to feel sorry” for Julie Smith, who really is the guardian of her husband’s estate. However, the judge noted that he needed to keep his emotions out of the judgment and determined that Smith and her attorneys had failed to meet the high burden of proof required to keep the injunction in place.

Although ivermectin is most frequently used in cattle, the FDA recommends it for use in humans to treat “diseases caused by specific parasitic worms,” such as head lice as well as rosacea, as well as other parasitic infections and skin conditions. As the delta version has wreaked havoc throughout the nation, there has been a surge in interest in the medication.

While some research is being conducted, none of the major medical organizations recommend ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has warned that reports of poisoning associated with the use of ivermectin have risen threefold this year, with a spike in July.

The judge said that there had been no convincing proof that ivermectin is efficient against COVID-19 produced in court and that he must also examine the rights of the hospital, as well as the potential consequences of ordering a hospital to provide medication.

As part of his decision, Oster remembered Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who hated those who burned the American flag but twice supported the legality of those who did so in court. In a statement, Kelly Martin, a spokesperson for UC Health, which runs West Chester Hospital, said the decision is “good” in terms of respect for science and medical experts’ competence. Still, she underlined that COVID-19 remains a danger.